ASeq Newsletter

ASeq Newsletter

The PacBio Revio Throws Away Most Reads?

May 14, 2024
∙ Paid

Summary: As far as I can tell the plot below is correct. The vast majority of ZMWs on the Revio produce less than 1 complete subread (but do produce data) and are discarded.

I’ve been thinking about this plot:

Which I created based on a few assumption in a previous post. The problem is that the Revio throwing out 45% of reads seems like “a lot”… and it niggles me a bit. What exactly is going on here… why are these reads thrown out?

PacBio provide a “fail” BAM file. But from what I can tell this only contains a subset of the failing reads, not “one representative read per ZMW”. In one example I looked at, the failed BAM contained ~350,000 reads. Where the plot above would be suggesting more like 12M.

As we shall see, the data we need lies elsewhere in the PacBio run folder…

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 Nava Whiteford · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture