1) Unclear, it's surprising! It's possible that the reference has a couple of alternate versions of "something" so I suspect some kind of artifact it would be interesting to follow up on.
2) Yes, good catch! I had to do some manipulation to get the data in the right orientation and this slipped though!
Very interesting, thanks Nava. Some thoughts:
1) Any idea what's the 0.5% of the genome that can't be resolved even at 100k readlength (from your 3rd graph).
2) Fig 4 and 5 have opposite Y axes; is Fig 4 Y axis inverted?
1) Unclear, it's surprising! It's possible that the reference has a couple of alternate versions of "something" so I suspect some kind of artifact it would be interesting to follow up on.
2) Yes, good catch! I had to do some manipulation to get the data in the right orientation and this slipped though!